We can't say anything concrete about how Ross Cadell voted on Australia's timber industry
How Ross Cadell voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should protect Australia's logging industry and the jobs it represents
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for Australia's timber industry” which Ross Cadell could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Ross Cadell on this policy.
| Division | Ross Cadell | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for Australia's timber industry” which Ross Cadell could have attended.
| Division | Ross Cadell | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
15th Jun 2023, 10:10 AM – Senate Ending Native Forest Logging Bill 2023 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea |
No | No |
7th Feb 2023, 6:26 PM – Senate Matters of Urgency - Global Biodiversity Framework - End native forest logging |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Ross Cadell has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.