We can't say anything concrete about how Peta Murphy voted on increasing workplace protections
How Peta Murphy voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase protections for workers by, for example, ensuring there are adequate dispute resolution processes available
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing workplace protections” which Peta Murphy could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Peta Murphy on this policy.
| Division | Peta Murphy | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing workplace protections” which Peta Murphy could have attended.
| Division | Peta Murphy | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
6th Feb 2024, 5:22 PM – Representatives Australian Human Rights Commission Amendment (Costs Protection) Bill 2023 - Report from Federation Chamber - Agree with the bill's main idea |
absent | Yes |
16th Nov 2023, 9:11 AM – Representatives Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Closing Loopholes) Bill 2023 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Peta Murphy was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.